JEE Main 2021 · 27 July · evening · Single correct · +4 / −1

If the Thompson model of the atom was correct, then the result of Rutherford's gold foil experiment would have been :

  1. (a) All of the α-particles pass through the gold foil without decrease in speed.
  2. (b) α-particles are deflected over a wide range of angles.
  3. (c) All α-particles get bounced back by 180°
  4. (d) α-particles pass through the gold foil deflected by small angles and with reduced speed.
Answer and solution

Answer (d) α-particles pass through the gold foil deflected by small angles and with…

Solution

Chemistry ma’am · 4 steps

In Thomson's atom the charge is spread thin, so nothing is strong enough to turn an alpha particle sharply.

  1. Thomson's picture. Positive charge is spread evenly through the whole atom, with electrons embedded in it like seeds in a watermelon. There is no small, dense centre of charge or mass.
  2. Weak, spread-out forces. An α-particle passing through feels only a weak electric force, because the positive charge is diluted over a large volume. The light electrons cannot turn a heavy α-particle much either.
  3. What you would see. Each α-particle would be nudged only slightly, giving small-angle deflections. It would also lose some speed as it pushes through the charged matter of the foil. No particle would bounce back.
  4. So. The expected result is option (d): α-particles pass through, deflected by small angles and with reduced speed.

The idea to keep. Large-angle scattering needs a tiny, dense, positive nucleus. Spread the charge out, as Thomson did, and you only get small deflections. Rutherford's rare back-scattering is what killed the Thomson model.

Answer from the NTA final answer key. Solution by PrepWiser.

Study Atomic Structure

Asked about 170 times in JEE Main since 2020. This question is from 2021.